
19th Sept 2009
Lagos, Nigeria barely escaped being the recipient
of toxic waste according to a new series of emails
released to explain how Abidjan in Ivory Coast
became the dumpsite for more than 400 tonnes of
highly toxic petrol waste from a ship, Probo Koala.
Investigators say as many as 95,000 people were
forced to seek medical attention, after experiencing
the side effects of the toxic waste poisoning, this
included chest pains, rashes, sores, scars,
nose-bleeding, difficulty in breathing, fatigue,
headaches, vomiting, diarrhoea. Thousands had to
evacuate their homes within the vicinity of the
dumping sites. Since the 2006 dumping more than a
dozen people have been reported dead in Abidjan,
from the poisonous effects of the waste.
Before berthing in Abidjan, the Probo Koala made
desperate efforts to offload its deadly cargo in
Lagos. In August 2006 the vessel arrived the shores
of Nigeria laden with Premium Motor Spirit (PMS),
locally known as “petrol,” for the Nigerian
Government.
But apart from the petrol, on board were hundreds of
tonnes of highly toxic waste, carried in a separate
compartment.
The waste had travelled a long way, and Trafigura
was desperate to dispose of it as cheaply as
possible.
Serious dollars
The journey of the toxic waste started in December
2005, when Trafigura saw the opportunity to make
millions of dollars from buying “bloody cheap”
petrol. The petrol was being sold in large
quantities by a Mexican refinery, which had been
piling up large quantities of it for close to two
and a half years. When there was no longer space to
store it, the refinery started to sell. The petrol
was “bloody cheap” because it contained high levels
of sulphur, making it unsuitable for use in
automobiles unless it underwent further processing.
In a December 2005 internal Trafigura email, James
McNicol told his colleagues “This is as cheap as
anyone can imagine and should make serious dollars.”
But there was a small problem.
The contaminated petrol needed to be purified. But
there were not many sites available for this
purification process, due to the toxicity of the
waste products (noxious smelling mercaptans and
phenols) from the purification process, known in the
industry as “caustic washing.” It involved the
treatment of the petrol with caustic soda.
“We have already spoken to all the main storage
companies, US / Singapore and European terminals no
longer allow the use of caustic soda washes since
local environmental agencies do not allow disposal
of the toxic caustic after treatment,” Trafigura’s
Naeem Ahmed told his colleagues by email on December
27, 2005.
Three months later, Trafigura’s Leon
Christophilopoulos, sent an email to his colleagues
in which he suggested getting, cheaply, a vessel
“that is about to be scrapped” and moving it to West
Africa “in order to carry out some of the caustic
washings over there?” Eventually Trafigura decided
to carry out the washing at sea, aboard the Probo
Koala, with a plan to discharge the waste at La
Skhirra, a tank farm on the Tunisian coast. The
washing went on as planned but La Skhirra’s
authorities refused to take the waste.
An April 18, 2006 email from Christophilopoulos
lamented: “La Skhirra where we were
washing/discharging will not let us discharge this
material anymore, so the ship we’re using for
washing is now converted to floating storage.”
Desperate to dispose of the toxic waste that was
sitting in the slop tanks of the Probo Koala, in
June Trafigura got in touch with Amsterdam Port
Services (APS), asking for help with disposing the
waste. The fact that it was the highly toxic product
of caustic washing was concealed. On analysis the
APS discovered it was highly toxic, and would as a
result be expensive to process. It therefore asked
for a “payment guarantee” before taking the waste.
Trafigura’s reaction to this was not included in the
released email exchanges, but what happened next was
that the Probo Koala set sail for Lagos, Nigeria;
its cargo of death still intact.
Lagos’ near miss
In Lagos Trafigura contacted long time business
partners, Daddo Maritime Services (shipping agents)
with a de-sloping request.
However, Daddo Maritime Services Limited, is
insisting it is an innocent party in this sorry
saga. The Managing Director, Mahmud Tukur told NEXT
as shipping agents, the duty of Daddo was to serve
as intermediaries between ship charterers, ship
owners and the government, and that the company had
done no wrong in accepting to help the British oil
trading firm, Trafigura carry out what was supposed
to be a routine ship cleaning exercise. The email
response from Daddo, sent on August 10, 2009
communicated Daddo’s acceptance of Trafigura’s
de-sloping (cleaning) request. The email however
added that the desloping would be put on hold until
after the petrol content of the ship was discharged.
Mr.Tukur explained that this was for security
reasons. According to him, bringing another vessel
(to carry out the cleaning) alongside a ship
discharging petroleum products would open his
company up to allegations of oil bunkering. Daddo
also said that as far as it was concerned the slop
was nontoxic, and was infact “normal” Mr.Tukur spoke
of a “code of conduct” that exists within the
shipping business. “If they tell us its slop we
assume its slop.” He added that Daddo never failed
to obtain “naval clearance” before facilitating
desloping operations.
An internal Trafigura email revealed the company’s
desire to have Daddo carry out the desloping carried
out “preferably offshore Lome [Togo] or as far as
possible offshore Nigeria and within International
Waters.” In another internal email reference is made
to the fact that Daddo’s Operations Manager “has
advised that they will only be able to arrange for a
barge to de-slop in Nigerian waters.”
Panic
It was somewhere around this time that Trafigura
began to panic. Fully aware of the high toxicity of
the slop, it feared the fallout of a mishandling -
or outright theft of the poisonous slop,in Lagos.
David Leigh, investigations editor of the Guardian
(United Kingdom),whose newspaper first released the
implicating emails, told NEXT in an email that
“Trafigura APPARENTLY feared that the waste would
then be sold as heating fuel on the Lagos black
market... their main anxiety SEEMED TO BE that
Trafigura would be held to blame for any
repercussions in Nigeria.”
An August 16 Trafigura email speaks of “concerns
about doing this in Nigerian waters.” In addition to
these fears the company also had to contend with
Dutch police who were reportedly demanding for
documentation certifying that the waste - which the
company had refused to process in Amsterdam - had
been properly disposed of.
Trafigura thus cancelled the Lagos plan, and, in an
email to its staff in Abidjan, made arrangements for
the waste to be disposed in Abidjan.
Merchant of death
The August 2006 disposal of the Probo Koala’s waste
was contracted, for $20,000 - (a tiny fraction of
what it would have cost had Trafigura settled for a
proper disposal in Amsterdam) to ‘Tommy’, an
Abidjan-based company owned by a Nigerian, Salomon
Ugborugbo.
|
ADVERTISEMENT
|
Mr.Ugborugbo’s trucks
collected the noxious waste from the Probo Koala and
dumped it at 17 sites across Abidjan. Shortly after
the dumping, the hospitalisations and deaths began.
In 2007 Trafigura paid the Ivorian Government $200
million to clean up the waste. But it resolutely
denied that the waste was toxic, and refused to
admit that it was liable for the dumping. It
insisted that “the Probo Koala’s slops could not
possibly have caused deaths and serious or long term
injuries.” |
Settlement
Then suddenly on Tuesday, September 16, the company
agreed to pay an undisclosed sum of money as
compensation to thousands of Ivorian victims who had
taken the company to court in an unprecedented class
action suit.
Trafigura’s web site describes it as “the world’s
third largest independent oil trader”, with a
turnover of US$73 billion in 2008. In 2000 it signed
a contract with Jamaica’s state-owned oil company to
help lift the crude oil allocated to the country by
the Nigerian Government. Trafigura was implicated in
the 2005 United Nations oil-for-food scandal in
Iraq.
Concerns
When NEXT raised concerns over the ease with which
poisonous waste could be brought into and dumped in
Nigerian territory, Daddo’s Managing Director was
very re-assuring, insisting the situation has
changed significantly in the three years since the
Probo Koala berthed in Lagos. “The controls are much
better in place... times have changed,” Mr. Tukur
said. He attributed the changes to the privatisation
programme of the Federal Government.
According to Mr.
Tukur the African Circle Pollution Management
Limited (which in 2004 signed a 25 year waste
management agreement with the Nigerian Ports
Authority), now has a proper slop processing plant
in Lagos, where slop samples are analysed before
handling.
|